Your Ad Here

Black Relationships, White Problems


Hey I'm back once again people and today I have a topic that I would like to discuss a little bit. Black relationships with White problems.

Sounds intriguing don't it? Hehe, I know.

I'm going to do some back story a little bit so prepare for a historical journey.

See the thing is that in Western society, black people have been conditioned into believing that the courting process goes a certain way, a way that is essentially modeled after white standards. Therefore. because our selection process is modified in order for us to feel as if we are operating on the same playing field when in fact we are not.





Black relationships usually suffer from problems that, for the most part, are confusing to us. We end up arguing and fighting for no apparent reason and the times when the reasons are valid they still are about issues that should not affect our livelihood.

White psychosis has diffused its way into our psyche and we in turn begin to suffer from white psychosis. We are told that there is only one (1) psychology and one way that the mind can be observed. This is not true. Psychology was created by Europeans to learn and observe the European mind and European behavior. The standards of which that are applied to using psychology as a tool to diagnose black problems is the reason why many psychologists, psychoanalysts, therapists and the like by their analytical, fragmented way of thinking believe that black people are psychologically ill. We are ill, but not with an illness of our own making. It is the modeling after the master (white man) to be equal with him and share his problems so that he would accept us.

This is a slave mindset.




Ever since the enslavement of Africans in America, there have been many instances where the tactic for gaining acceptance to stop the physical and emotional trauma needed to be implemented. African slave women would straighten their hair with a heated fork in order to gain the slave master's acceptance and African male slaves would do the same. The reason why "Beauty Salons" and "Barber Shops" were created were for just that cause. Since mulattoes had naturally "good hair" and lighter skin than the typical dark-skinned African, they were guaranteed better treatment and even survival. So the tactic needed to be added, they needed to alter themselves to survive.

The white man beat his women. He had sex with them for leisure instead of reproduction. He did not know of the spiritualistic properties of sexual intercourse. And many African slave women were sexually involved with white men and they treated them like they would their white women. The black woman became sexualized and believed that the treatment she received from the powerful slave master was the standard for her relaitionships. The African slave males saw this and tried to compete with the white man. Since his black woman seemed to discredit his importance and sexuality, he felt the urge the to dress like the white man and court like the white man and considering the conditioning of the black woman, it worked out perfectly.



See the black male had been demasculinized in front of his women and children so they were seemingly powerless. Black women wre raped in front of tied up black men and whipped whilst the raping took place, so what could the black man do to save his women? Not a thing.

What other model have black couples had that showed them what a black relationship is like without white problems?

Think of at least 5.

I didn't come up with any either.

This is what you need to understand, yes relationships have their problems but why are these problems based off of the standards of another race? Standards of which we were never meant to live up to?

More on this later...

Peace

AdBrite

Arab Slave Trade

While Europeans targeted men in West Africa, the 'Arab' trade primarily harvested the women of East Africa to serve as domestic slaves, wet nannies and sex-slaves in the infamous harems. This trade trickled over millennia is estimated to have taken 10 million Africans via the Eastern route to India, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, and also via the Trans-Saharan route to North Africa and the Mediterranean, where in slave markets such as Ceuta, Morocco, Africans were purchased to work as servants in Spain, Portugal, and other European countries.


This trickle trade really only boomed in the 18 th and 19 th century, prior to this period the trade between Arabia and Africa was more focused on iron, ivory and animal products. There is very little evidence in the sources to support the claim that slaving was ever a major enterprise of any significance prior to the 18 the century boom.



LEGACY AND DIFFERENCE

Arab enslavement of Africans was radically different from its European counterpart. It was more complex and varied depending on time and place. Thus the slavery seen in Iraq with the zanj was not similar to slavery in Zanzibar. Also 'Arab' is not a racial group, some Arabs are African and some are White and Jewish.

One of the biggest differences between Arab slaving and European slaving was that slaves were drawn from all racial groups and they were rarely used as a means of crop production; slaves were not the economic engine behind Arab economies. Arab slavery generally lacked large droves of sugar plantations where slaves toiled to the crack of a whip in the hot sun . Unlike the European trade in enslaved Africans the physical remnants of this trade are very hard to measure. There are no Ghettos, mental institutions or prisons holding African people. Many women stolen from Africa were stolen to serve the infamous Arabian harems; their children were thus born free to Arab fathers and thus would have been heirs to wealth and status, fully and equally assimilated into the population. Many African people thus rose to great stations by virtue of their Arab fathers. The infamous eunuchs were infertile, and the other men who were enslaved would have gradually married non-African women, hence facilitating the absorption of African culture and lineage into an Arab one. The contrasting differences between racial definitions on the Arabian continent as oppose to Europe assist in blending the majority of Africans stolen from Africa into the general population of Arabia. However, in the West there was no transcending “racial stigmas.”

ISLAM AND SLAVERY

When Islam arrived, war and servitude were features of African and Arabian life. Judaism existed among certain Arab tribes as well as Christianity, and like them Islam did not blatantly out law slavery; Islam did however blatantly outlawed chattel enslavement. The Qu'ran with every reference to slavery ask the believer to free the slave as atonement for sin, the term "emancipating a slave and feeding an orphan" are repeated constantly throughout the Qu'ran as acts which gain God's favor. Also there were regulations which enhanced the pre-Islamic laws with respect to the treatment of enslaved people. They were entitled to good care, to the same clothing and food as their masters. These enslaved people were more akin to indentured servants in Europe than Chattel slaves in the Americas.

They are your brothers whom Allah placed under your hands. Feed them with what you eat, clothe them with what you wear and do not impose duties upon them which will overcome them. If you so impose duties, then assist them.

Whoever kills his slave, we will kill him.

Whoever slaps his slave or strikes him, his atonement is to free him" (narrated by Muslim by the way of ibn Umar).

It became a fundamental principle of Islamic jurisprudence that the natural condition, and therefore the presumed status, of mankind was freedom. Despite this, there were the greedy and the vindictive that sought to make slaves of their Muslim brothers and sisters as well as other Africans. There were also many Christian and Jewish Arab tribes and well as other indigenous Arabs that continued their tradition of slaving. Because Islamic Sharia had laws pertaining to slavery it was seen by the opportunist as a natural God sanctioned feature of life. Conveniently, the numerous laws of manumission were given a social back seat.


Overzealous Europeans have always over-documented the Arab trade in enslaved Africans to alleviate their guilt concerning their own trade. "Well the Arabs did it too " became the common tone of contemporary historians. Sadly, many African-American historians who have only these European sources to infer history from have taken these second-hand guilt-massaging accounts as gospel. However, it is a well-known fact that Europeans in their artistic depictions of slave raids have always intentionally portrayed slave raiders as Muslim Africans or Arabs .

IP

Traffic